Monday, April 18, 2011

Sneak Attack Hearing On HPA Fee Bill Tomorrow In Olympia - UPDATED!

UPDATE 4/19/11 -- If you need them, here are some talking points in opposition to SSB 5862 from Bruce Beatty:

1. The bill was poorly haphazardly created containing obvious errors;
a) 2 definitions for "sandbar"
b) Section 103 states that the department "shall charge a one hundred fifty dollar submittal fee and a processing fee.." but the next paragraph states that "The department shall charge a seventy-five dollar submittal fee for single site low complexity hydraulic project permits"
c) Bill summaries and Fiscal notes state that the Gold and Fish Pamplet HPA's are exempt from fee's, but there is no language in the bill to support these statements.
d) Establishes a fee structure, then provides DFW the authority to reduce fee's based upon circumstances and at "it's discretion." There is no specific provision for reimbursement, (fee's must be paid in advance) and there is no check or balance as to whom gets the reduced fee allowing favoritism or Fraud.


2. This legislation will expand WDFW's regulatory authority. In addition to being required below the Ordinary High Water Line, HPA's will be required for certain activities (A dike, levee, bridge, shoreline or streambank protection project (new definition), or mineral prospecting and mining) in the channel migration zone (new definition), one hundred year floodplain (new definition), or within two hundred feet landward of the ordinary high water line.

3. Projects that expend enormous amounts of time, resources and $money$, such as fish passage barrier and fish habitat enhancement projects are exempted from all fees. The organizations who fall under this category already receive a Streamlined Permit process under RCW 77.55.181, and in most cases receive funding through grants. Permits issued under this statute are already exempted from permits and fee's by local governments.


4. The legislation makes no provisions that would allow an individual to obtain a permit for less than a five year term at a reduced fee.

5. The department has told the stakeholders that these permits will be given for 5 years. This legislation does not modify the length that a permit will be issued. It states that permits will be issued for up to 5 years, which leaves the length of a permit up to the discretion of the department.


6. The title of this statute will change to the "Hydraulic Code" from "Construction projects in state waters" which will forever change what the original intent of this legislation was when established in 1943.

7. Establishes a civil penalty of up to $10,000 per violation. This is up from $100 per day and is in addition the the Gross Misdemeanor Charge, punishable by up to one year in jail and/or a $5,000 fine. The lowest penalty proposed is $2,500.


8. There will not be an increase to revenue as the largest users of the program are State Agencies(WDNR, WDOT, & WDFW).

9. There will be an INCREASE of expenditures by the State, the Agencies, and by Counties. Take a look at the fiscal notes and notice the amount that will be required for capital expenditures and the number of additional employee's that must be hired. This is not a reduction of government or streamlining.

Please pass this information on to all who use or may use the HPA program. This includes those with Bulkheads, Marina's or Landscape management plans that select fish for coverage under such a plan and to those who fall under the Forest Practices Permit.

If you are able to attend the public hearings, please do so, and do not forget to sign in and mark your position (CON).


-------------------------------

The HPA Fee bill (SB 5862 and HB 2008) has arrived in a new incarnation called SSB 5862 and -- SURPRISE! -- is scheduled for a public hearing TOMORROW before the Senate Committee on Ways & Means.

As of this writing, the time and place are 2:30 P.M. in the J. A. Cherberg Building, Senate Hearing Room 4 in Olympia.

The text of the bill may be downloaded from the link: SSB 5862, titled AN ACT Relating to the administration of natural resources programs.

The link for the Legislative Bill Information Website page for this bill is here.

If you cannot attend the hearing, you may send comments via phone or email to the committee members using the information at the link here. Click on each committee member's name to be taken to their homepage where an email link is available.

More news as it develops.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

thanks for the heads-up tom.

This is what I am concerned about:

It appears that mineral prospecting and mining will be exempt from fees for HPAs, but definitions include:
"Small scale prospecting and mining" means the use of only the following methods: Pans; nonmotorized sluice boxes; concentrators; and minirocker boxes for the discovery and recovery of minerals."

If they are trying to define the mining exempted from fees as non-motorized than we have a problem. It is not clear to me because the mining listed as exempted is not named as "small scale" when named in the following sections?

The definitions required for denial will change as well. "Adversely affect fish life" is broader than the current definition of "protection of fish life".


-mike





(5) If the department receives applications for project types not
16 identified in subsections (2) through (4) of this section, it shall
17 categorize them as low, medium, or high complexity and charge fees
18 based on those categories consistent with the most similar project
19 types identified in subsections (2) through (4) of this section.
20 (6)(a) Unless the department establishes a lower fee consistent
21 with this section, a hydraulic project permit application must be
22 assessed one of the following processing fees:
23 (i) Seventy-five dollars for a single site low complexity hydraulic
24 project;
25 (ii) Five hundred dollars for a single site medium complexity
26 hydraulic project;
27 (iii) One thousand one hundred fifty dollars for a single site high
28 complexity hydraulic project;
29 (iv) For a multiple site permit, the applicable permit processing
30 fee assessed under this subsection for one of the hydraulic project
31 sites identified in the permit application, and twenty percent of the
32 applicable permit processing fee assessed under this subsection for
33 each additional site; and
34 (v) Four thousand eight hundred fifty dollars for a general permit
35 authorizing up to three types of hydraulic projects, and twenty percent
36 of the applicable permit processing fee assessed under this subsection
37 for each additional type of hydraulic project. The fee charged for
p. 13 SSB 5862
1 renewal of a general permit that relates to the same project types and
2 defined geographic area as the initial permit is one hundred dollars.
3 (b) An application for mineral prospecting and mining activities is
4 exempt from permit processing fees.


The department shall refund fifty percent of the permit
31 processing fee to any person that properly applies for any permit or
32 permit modification under RCW 77.55.021 if the department:
33 (a) Fails to process the application or request within the
34 timelines required by RCW 77.55.021; or
35 (b) Denies the permit because the proposed project would adversely
36 affect fish life.

Five thousand dollars for a violation of this chapter or rules
26 adopted under this chapter relating to a hydraulic project categorized
27 or that would be categorized as a medium complexity hydraulic project
28 under section 103 of this act; and

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/documents/billdocs/2011-12/Pdf/Bills/Senate%20Bills/5862-S.pdf



-



-